I didn't attend an appointment for annual diabetic eye screening last month but have noticed clear changes in my vision. Changes for the worse. I'm not even sure if this has anything to do with diabetes but what happened is that for a few months I stopped taking all medications. My numbers went really high and I noticed that I had itchy skin, Glyco Care supplement bladder problems and extreme thirst. Now my eyes have always needed glasses and when I wear them I can see good. But since my numbers went sky high for those few months my eyes have changed. My glasses don't work for close up things such like looking at my mobile phone or reading a book. I have to take them off. What I have found is that I now lift them up onto my head a lot. My glasses still work for driving and watching TV and seeing things far away. I can't afford new glasses at the moment so have not had a regular eye test for 4 years. Do you think that my eye trouble is just regular wear and tear or is it down to diabetes? I can still go to the screening but wonder what the heck they would do anyway other than tell me to get new glasses (which I don't have the money to buy). Anyway now my numbers are near normal, if the vision problems is from diabetes will my eyes clear up as I get better?

What is this post about? The list of negative effects of meat consumption is long. They range from animal suffering over global food distribution considerations to climate change and more. In this post, I want to elaborate on the problematic aspects of eating meat and show how it is possible and easy to switch diets without any loss in quality of life. TLDR; please don’t eat meat - it’s really bad for everyone. I think most people have heard that animals are held in bad conditions, that meat is less effective than other kinds of food on an energy per gram measure, that meat uses a lot of water during production, etc. However, during most of the discussions I personally had, heard or read about the topic there were astonishingly little numbers and weighings involved. To exaggerate - "you are either a Nazi for eating meat" or "you are a Nazi for taking away someone’s freedom to eat meat" is a discourse that I have witnessed way too often.

Therefore I want to focus mostly on the size of the effects w.r.t. I think the most obvious but also most impactful problem with an animal diet is the animal suffering it creates. To give a broad overview of the current state of meat consumption consider the following figures. The number of animals killed per year increases pretty drastically, the growth of chickens killed for consumption looks exponential and that for pigs linear. We obviously do not know if that will continue but we do know that consumption has not always been this high. Given that meat is a status symbol in many countries and poverty goes down this is a likely indicator for Glyco Care Wellness Guidemetabolic health support a still-growing trend. The global meat consumption is actually extremely high in objective terms. Assuming that the world has around 7 billion inhabitants this would imply that on average a person eats roughly eight chickens and a fifth of a pig per year. This average gets even bigger when considering that many countries do not consume a lot of meat either due to poverty or religious reasons, e.g. India or many African countries.

Looking at the global distribution, richer countries consume more meat than poorer ones. The USA, for example, consumes 8 billion chickens per year which translate to roughly 25 chickens per person and year. The conditions in which animals are held are horrible in the vast majority of cases (check out mercy for animals for images and Glyco Care Wellness Guidemetabolic health support further facts). One could consume meat from a more sustainable and fair production but it still comes with all the effects of climate change and inefficient allocation of resources. Additionally, it is not scalable to the same extent as factory farming and therefore many people would have to reduce the amount of meat consumption in any case. However, my main focus is less on exposing these conditions but rather on arguing what they mean in more comprehensive terms. In the Holocaust approximately 17 Million people were murdered. 0.00028th of the moral worth of a human this means humanity commits one Holocaust every year on chickens alone.